There is a term called "dynamic stability. This means that the pendulum is moving toward stability as it moves. For example, when a pendulum is displaced from a certain state, it swings once to the opposite side in the process of returning to its original state, then gradually decreases its swing range, and finally stabilizes. This can also be seen in an airplane's attempt to return to its original flight path based on the principle of dynamic stability when the plane's direction changes due to turbulence. Static stability, on the other hand, refers to the stability of an object or system when it is at rest. It refers to the gradual stabilization of an object or system from an unstable state without swinging to the opposite side. It is not a question of whether dynamic stability or static stability is better, but rather that the way of stability changes depending on the situation.
I believe there is "dynamic stability" in thinking and thinking as well. When there are opposing opinions, listening to the two extremes, understanding this side and that side, and gradually reaching a middle understanding, "I understand both sides of the argument," may be similar to dynamic stability. For example, if two countries are at war, you consider the opinions of both sides, and you worry, "Hmmm, this is a difficult problem.
I think a wise person is one who does not hold fixed opinions and is able to show understanding for opposing ideas. Holding a fixed opinion all the time means that one cannot change one's mind, and when an opposing opinion comes along, one may argue with a counter-argument to defeat the other, which is not logical and breaks the stability. The ability to hold multiple viewpoints and change your mind depending on the situation, rather than sticking to one point of view or opinion, will help you in problem solving and communication.